The late Benjamin Graham, often hailed as the father of value investing, famously remarked: “In the short run, the market is a voting machine, but in the long run, it is a weighing machine.”
This quote becomes more significant with time spent in the markets, shaping leadership and interpersonal dynamics.
In the immediate term, everything hinges on the scoreboard.
The price varied. The trade was successful. The fund excelled. The team prevailed. The decision appeared sound.
However, real situations are rarely this simple.
I was reminded of this while tuning into Nicolai Tangen, CEO of Norges Bank Investment Management, who oversees the largest publicly traded financial fund—the Norwegian Sovereign Wealth Fund.
Tangen engaged in a dialogue with Georgi Ganev, CEO of Kinnevik, and the former Kinnevik chair, James Anderson.
He raised an intriguing question regarding accountability: how poorly would Ganev need to perform before Anderson would make a different kind of call?
Anderson’s reply struck a chord: “I believe it should focus more on the quality of the decision-making than the outcome.”
Simple. Composed. Yet deeply strategic.
This statement holds weight due to its origin.
James Anderson spent decades at Baillie Gifford, managing the Scottish Mortgage Investment Trust from 2000 to 2022 and achieving remarkable long-term returns.
He was an early advocate for companies like Amazon, Tesla, and Alibaba, even when many viewed those investments as overly ambitious, risky, or ahead of their time.
When someone with his credentials asserts that outcomes don’t always reflect decision quality, it’s prudent to pay attention.
We live in a results-oriented world
A stock rises, and the investor is considered brilliant.
A share price dips, and the thesis is scrutinized.
A company misses quarterly expectations, and trust is lost.
The scoreboard morphs into the story.
Yet, outcomes and decisions are fundamentally different.
A well-founded decision can lead to a poor short-term result. A poor decision can, by chance, be rewarded. A disciplined investor may be ahead of the curve, while a reckless one can be temporarily correct.
This complexity makes leadership, investing, and strategy challenging.
The world doesn’t provide immediate evaluations of thought quality.
This is where the Arsenal narrative becomes significant …
When Mikel Arteta took over as manager in 2019, Arsenal was not where its supporters wanted them to be. Criticism was rampant. Patience was limited. The phrase ‘Trust the process’ became both a mantra and, at times, a joke.
For several seasons, the results didn’t fully showcase the quality of the efforts involved. The club finished second three consecutive times.
To some, that was perceived as a failure.
Yet beneath these outcomes, a solid foundation was being laid: structure, discipline, recruitment clarity, tactical identity, emotional resilience, and a culture capable of withstanding pressure.
Then, in May 2026, Arsenal celebrated winning the Premier League championship for the first time in 22 years.
Finally, the results reflected the process.
This encapsulates Anderson’s message
The real challenge isn’t whether every decision succeeds right away.
The genuine test revolves around whether the decision was made with clarity, discipline, and integrity, based on the knowledge available at the time.
For investors, this goes beyond philosophy; it is practical.
If we only reward outcomes, we create the wrong incentives. People hesitate to take early positions. They conform to the consensus. They choose defensible decisions over genuinely insightful ones.
They start optimizing for approval rather than authenticity.
A strong investment culture demands something deeper. It requires the courage to ask better questions.
Not just ‘Did it work?’ but ‘Was the reasoning sound?’
Was the evidence compelling?
Were the risks properly addressed?
Was the timeframe suitable?
Would we come to the same conclusion again under similar circumstances?
This is how you distinguish luck from skill
It’s also how you build trust.
Trust isn’t formed by pretending every decision will be right.
It’s forged by showing that every decision was made with care, integrity, and discipline.
The market will inevitably experience moments when it misreads effort, patience, and quality. Leadership will continually be challenged before the final results materialize.
And often, the finest decisions will feel uncomfortable before the benefits become clear.
So, before assessing the next investment, business choice, or strategic move based on its immediate outcome, take a pause.
Ask yourself one question: was the quality of the decision sufficient to be repeated?
Andrew Padoa is a portfolio manager at Otto1890.
Brought to you by Otto1890.
Moneyweb does not endorse any product or service advertised in sponsored articles on our platform.
